Trusted Poker Guide Since 2004
About UsContactResponsible Gambling
PokerSites.orgPlay Now โ†’
๐Ÿ† Best Poker Sites๐Ÿ’ฐ Best Bonuses๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ US Poker๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ CA Poker๐Ÿ“Š Traffic Rankings๐Ÿ“ฑ Mobile Poker๐ŸŽฐ Online Casinoโšฝ Sportsbook
News

Sean Perry Burns $200K at SHRB XI

By jason-murphyยทOctober 12, 2026ยท7 min read

Sean Perry went through $200,000 in a single day at Super High Roller Bowl XI, using both of his $100,000 entries and exiting the field before Day 2. PokerNews dubbed him a "poker villain" burning through the money, and the nickname fits the entertainment value of the story. But behind the headline is a useful lesson about reentry tournaments, variance, and how even elite players can lose two full bullets in one session. Here is what happened on Day 1, who led the field, and what it means for tournament players at any buy-in.

The Event

Super High Roller Bowl XI was a $100,000 buy-in no-limit hold'em tournament played at the PokerGO Studio in Las Vegas. Players got one reentry, and 23 entries were recorded on Day 1 (Thursday), with 12 players advancing. Late registration remained open until Day 2 began on Friday, October 9, so the field was able to grow. It eventually reached 28 entries, and Brandon Wilson went on to win $1,125,000. Our Brandon Wilson recap covers the final table in detail.

Perry was one of 17 players who started Day 1 with a 300,000-chip stack, which at the opening blinds represented a deep and comfortable stack.

How Perry Lost Two Bullets

Bullet one

An early pot against Nick Petrangelo and Adrian Mateos lifted Perry to 360,000 chips. By Level 4, however, he had fallen to 23,000. Two double-ups against Kristen Foxen gave him some life, but he eventually lost his remaining chips and used his reentry. A stack that swung from 360,000 to 23,000 within a few levels shows how fast chips move in a field of elite players with deep stacks and sharp postflop skills.

Bullet two

His second entry ended in a hand against Alex Foxen, according to the PokerNews report. This is how it played out:

  1. Perry raised to 13,000 from the button with Jโ™ฆ 9โ™ . Foxen, in the small blind, called with 3โ™  3โ™ฆ.
  2. The flop was Jโ™ฃ 7โ™  3โ™ฃ. Foxen checked, then raised Perry's 10,000 continuation bet to 29,000. Perry called with top pair.
  3. The turn was the 4โ™ฆ. Foxen bet 32,000, and Perry called.
  4. The river was the 9โ™ฆ, giving Perry two pair. Foxen bet 150,000, putting Perry all-in for his remaining 114,000. Perry called and was eliminated by Foxen's set of threes, which had flopped.

Was It a Mistake?

The most interesting question is whether Perry did anything wrong. From a strategic standpoint, the answer is probably not in any obvious way.

Perry raised a strong suited-gap hand from the button, a standard play. He continued with a small bet on a flop that gave him top pair. Foxen's check-raise on a J-7-3 two-tone board is consistent with a range that includes sets, two pair, strong draws and some bluffs. Perry's call with top pair and a decent kicker is reasonable; folding top pair to a single check-raise at 29,000 would be too tight against a range with plenty of draws and bluffs.

The turn call is also defensible. The four did not obviously change the board's texture. When the river paired Perry's nine, he made two pair, jacks and nines, and called a big river bet. That is where the debate lies. Foxen put him all-in for 114,000 into a pot that was already large. Two pair is a bluff-catcher in this range, and with only 114,000 behind, the price meant Perry needed to be right a relatively small percentage of the time. If you want to quantify a decision like this, our pot odds guide shows the calculation, and our poker odds calculator can help you estimate equity.

In short, a call was close to automatic, and Foxen simply had the nuts relative to Perry's range. That is variance, not a blunder. But variance still costs real money.

Day 1 Leaders

Twelve players advanced to Day 2. The chip counts were:

Rank Player Chips Big blinds
1 Seth Davies 882,000 110
2 Alex Foxen 768,000 96
3 Igor Yaroshevskyy 749,000 94
4 Talal Shakerchi 704,000 88
5 Jeremy Ausmus 572,000 72
6 Brandon Wilson 558,000 70
7 Joao Simao 548,000 69
8 David Coleman 533,000 67
9 Adrian Mateos 474,000 59
10 Kristen Foxen 423,000 53
11 Jason Koon 347,000 43
12 Brock Wilson 344,000 43

Seth Davies, the chip leader, is a two-time SHRB champion with both wins in 2024. He won $3.2 million at SHRB IX in Cyprus, a $300,000 buy-in event, then $1.5 million at the $100,000 PLO event in Las Vegas two months later. Joao Simao was the defending champion and had finished second in that week's PLO edition. Alex Foxen, second in chips, had cashed in a Super High Roller Bowl only once before, finishing runner-up to Isaac Haxton in 2018.

Ben Tollerene and Vinny Lingham also used both entries. Nick Schulman, Jesse Lonis, Chris Hunichen and Petrangelo were eliminated on Day 1 but could still reenter before play resumed, and Petrangelo did, eventually finishing second.

What Reentry Formats Do to Players

Reentry tournaments change decision-making. Each bullet is a separate buy-in, but the player's overall investment is cumulative. The way to think about it is:

  • Each bullet should be evaluated on its own merits. Whether you have lost one bullet should not change how you play the next, but it often does. This is a mental trap related to tilt.
  • Reentry makes early aggression more attractive. Because you can buy back in, busting early costs only part of your cumulative equity. Players with deeper bankrolls may play looser early, accepting more variance to build a big stack.
  • Fields get bigger and softer later. In many reentry events, late registration lets players rebuy after busting, which increases the prize pool and the number of entries. In this case the field grew from 23 on Day 1 to 28.

For recreational players, reentry formats appear in many online and live tournaments. Before buying a second bullet, ask yourself a question: would I enter this tournament fresh at this price? If not, skip it. The sunk cost of the first entry is irrelevant.

Bankroll Reality Check

A $200,000 loss in a day is a startling number, but context matters. At this level, players typically play with backers, share action and have enormous bankrolls. For most readers, the relevant lesson is scale. If a single buy-in is 5 percent of your bankroll, two bullets are 10 percent, and a bad day can set you back significantly. Our bankroll management guide explains how many buy-ins to hold for tournaments, and our tournaments page explains different formats.

If you want a sense of how the high-stakes world works, see our high-stakes poker guide.

The Takeaway

Sean Perry's Day 1 shows that in poker, even correct decisions can lose, and even the best players can go through two full buy-ins in a few hours. His hand against Foxen was a standard line that ran into a set. The practical lessons are to judge your decisions by quality, not results, to treat each bullet as a fresh decision, and to size your buy-ins so that bad days do not become disasters. Whether you play $100,000 or $100, the principle is the same.

Tags:Sean PerrySuper High Roller Bowlreentry tournamentsvarianceSeth Davies

Related Articles

18+ only. Gambling can be addictive โ€” please play responsibly. PokerSites.org is an independent guide not operated by any gambling operator. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, contact NCPG (1-800-GAMBLER), BeGambleAware, or GamCare.