Trusted Poker Guide Since 2004
About UsContactResponsible Gambling
PokerSites.orgPlay Now โ†’
๐Ÿ† Best Poker Sites๐Ÿ’ฐ Best Bonuses๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ US Poker๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ CA Poker๐Ÿ“Š Traffic Rankings๐Ÿ“ฑ Mobile Poker๐ŸŽฐ Online Casinoโšฝ Sportsbook
News

$4.26M Pot Breaks HSP All-Time Record

By jason-murphyยทSeptember 7, 2026ยท6 min read

High Stakes Poker has a new all-time record. Eric Wasserson beat Michael "Texas Mike" Moncek in a pot worth $4,260,000 โ€” the largest in the show's twenty-year history โ€” after Moncek fired three streets with a busted draw into a hand that had improved to a flush on the river.

The pot capped an extraordinary run of PokerGO's flagship cash-game show and produced an aftermath almost as talked-about as the hand itself, with Moncek accusing Wasserson of nit-rolling before publicly apologising for his behaviour.

The Hand

The action started conventionally enough. Wasserson opened to $20,000. Moncek three-bet to $80,000, clearing the rest of the table, and Wasserson called.

The flop gave Wasserson a pair and a flush draw โ€” a strong but not overwhelming holding โ€” while Moncek connected with only a single club. Wasserson checked, Moncek continued for $100,000, and Wasserson called.

On the turn Wasserson checked again. Moncek fired $330,000 and was called once more. With over a million dollars already in the middle, the river completed Wasserson's flush. What followed took the pot to $4.26 million, and Moncek's bluff โ€” a well-constructed one, given his hand had genuine backdoor equity and Wasserson's checking line looked capped โ€” ran directly into the top of the calling range.

Why the Line Was Reasonable and Still Lost

It is worth being fair to Moncek's play here, because the result obscures the logic. Three-betting pre-flop, continuing on the flop, and firing again on the turn is a coherent multi-street bluffing line against an opponent who has check-called twice. The story it tells is consistent: a strong overpair or a big made hand betting for value.

The problem is that Wasserson's check-call, check-call sequence with a pair and a flush draw is precisely the kind of hand that does not fold, and it is a substantial part of his range in that spot. A pair plus a draw has both showdown value and improvement equity, which makes it one of the stickiest holdings in poker. Bluffing into it three streets is not a mistake in isolation, but it requires the river to miss โ€” and when the river completes the draw, the bluff is drawing dead against the worst possible outcome.

This is the fundamental tension in large-pot bluffing that our guide to how to bluff explores in detail: the boards that make your opponent's continuing range weakest are usually the boards that also make your own hand weakest, and the boards that complete draws simultaneously strengthen their range and destroy your fold equity.

The Aftermath

Moncek was not happy. He accused Wasserson of nit-rolling โ€” poker slang for slow-rolling or otherwise behaving badly with the winner โ€” a complaint Wasserson deflected with a straightforward observation. "I've never played a pot that big before," he said.

Moncek subsequently apologised publicly, saying he felt he had crossed a line. That is worth noting, because the alternative โ€” high-stakes players trading accusations indefinitely on social media โ€” has become a familiar pattern in poker's streaming era, and it rarely reflects well on anyone.

There is a more sympathetic reading of the moment. Losing a $4.26 million pot on a bluff that had a coherent plan behind it is, by any standard, a brutal experience. The show's format means it happens in front of cameras with commentary and an audience, with no opportunity to process privately. That is the trade high-stakes players make in exchange for the games existing at all, but it does not make the moment easier.

Are the Pots Real?

The size of the pot prompted a predictable round of scepticism, with viewers questioning whether High Stakes Poker's million-dollar pots reflect genuine money at risk. Moncek responded directly to that criticism.

The question is a reasonable one to ask of any televised cash game, and the honest answer is that it depends on the show and the player. Some televised games involve staking arrangements, sponsorship deals or partial buy-in coverage that reduce a given player's actual exposure. That has been true of high-stakes poker on television for two decades and is not unique to any single production.

What is verifiable is that PokerGO's High Stakes Poker has run continuously for years with a consistent player pool and consistent stake levels, and that the players involved are individuals with documented histories of playing at these levels away from cameras. Wasserson in particular has been a fixture of the show's biggest pots.

For viewers, the practical point is that the strategy on display is real regardless of who is covering what portion of the buy-in. The hands are played out, the decisions are made under genuine pressure, and the lessons transfer.

What This Means for Players

Three takeaways from a hand almost none of us will ever replicate.

Pair-plus-draw hands are calling machines. If you take one thing from this pot, make it this: when your opponent has check-called twice on a board where flush draws are live, a large share of their range has both a pair and a draw. Those hands do not fold to river bets. Sizing your bluffs to attack that range specifically is usually a losing proposition, and finding a different bluffing candidate โ€” one with blockers to the draw โ€” is almost always better. Our poker odds guide covers how often draws complete and why that matters for bluff selection.

Multi-street bluffs require a river plan. The most common error in aggressive lines is firing streets one and two without deciding in advance what rivers you will continue on. A bluff that has no give-up condition is not a strategy; it is momentum. Deciding before the turn which river cards you fire and which you check is the discipline that separates profitable aggression from expensive stubbornness.

Emotional control is a skill, and it is trainable. The reaction to losing the pot became a bigger story than the pot. Every player has a version of this, scaled to their own stakes โ€” the hand that produces a reaction they later regret. Our guide to what tilt is covers the mechanics of why it happens and the practical interventions that work.

For players wanting to study high-stakes cash strategy, the cash games and high stakes hubs cover the format in depth, and the poker on TV page tracks where the major cash-game shows currently stream.

Sources: Poker.org, PokerNews, CardPlayer

Tags:High Stakes PokerEric WassersonTexas Mikecash gamesPokerGOrecord pot

Related Articles

18+ only. Gambling can be addictive โ€” please play responsibly. PokerSites.org is an independent guide not operated by any gambling operator. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, contact NCPG (1-800-GAMBLER), BeGambleAware, or GamCare.